Sudan to hold first multi-party elections in 24 years

January 7th, 2010

 

KHARTOUM (Reuters) – Sudan will hold its first multi-party elections in 24 years in April. But already there are complaints about fraud, irregularities and obstacles to opposition parties taking part.

Here are some possible scenarios in the run up to the elections.

BOYCOTT

A group of more than 20 political parties said they would boycott the elections if a package of democratic laws was not passed. All the laws were passed in parliament in December.

But the law governing granting the intelligence services wide powers to arrest and search was only forced through by President Omar Hassan al-Bashir’s dominant National Congress Party (NCP) in the teeth of fierce opposition.

While concerns remain over that law and a stringent media bill, the parties are however likely to participate in the elections and many have already announced their presidential candidates.

ALLIANCES

About 20 political parties who formed a joint position in south Sudan’s capital Juba last year have said they may field joint candidates for the parliamentary and state governor elections.

The NCP has expressed concern at an opposition alliance against their candidates. For smaller parties like the Communist Party an alliance would be an advantage. But the Umma Party, which historically has been one of Sudan’s largest political parties, wants a bigger share of seats, its members say.

Some analysts believe the opposition will be unlikely to agree on fully integrated lists in time for nominations next week and may field only women’s or partially joint lists. A quarter of parliamentary seats are reserved for women.

OPPOSITION DIVISIONS

The only major opposition party outside the Juba alliance is the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) headed by the al-Merghani family. They are in talks with the NCP but have yet to announce a formal position ahead of the elections.

The Umma Party and DUP formed a joint government after winning the last democratic elections in 1986, before being overthrown by Bashir in a coup three years later.

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

The Juba alliance parties will field separate nominations for the presidential elections to split the vote. If no one gets more than half the presidential vote, the top two candidates go head to head in another round of voting. Alliance members say they would unite to back any second-round candidate against Bashir, who is widely expected to be one of the front runners.

BASHIR AND THE ICC

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Bashir last year for war crimes in Darfur, a move the NCP portrayed as Western infringement on Sudan’s sovereignty.

The move was followed by a nationwide publicity campaign portraying Bashir as a strong leader standing firm against foreign interference. The NCP is desperate for Bashir to win the presidential election to legitimise his government in the face of international condemnation over atrocities in Darfur.

DARFUR

Darfur was for years a base for the Umma Party. But the rebellion led by young mostly non-Arab rebels in 2003 and the government’s brutal counter-insurgency campaign broke down traditional tribal allegiances in the arid region.

In the absence of a comprehensive Darfur peace deal, rebel leaders have told their constituents not to participate in elections.

They question whether credible elections can be held in Darfur while the conflict continues. However the National Elections Commission has said large numbers of those who fled their homes to camps in Darfur have registered to vote.

FRAUD

Opposition parties accuse the NCP of misleading and intimidating voters, taking their registration slips and faking identity papers. They also say the requirements for candidacy of not holding any criminal record may rule out many of their own members, who have been imprisoned on trumped up charges by the government over the years.

In the south, the NCP accused the former rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) of vote-rigging after five of the 10 southern states registered more than 100 percent of eligible voters. The SPLM said the census, on which the estimated numbers of voters were based, was flawed and the two parties have yet to agree on how to overcome the SPLM’s rejection of the census.

POSSIBLE VIOLENCE

Opposition parties worry that the NCP’s control over the police, intelligence services and army as well as state television and radio will sway the vote. Police violently broke up two peaceful opposition demonstrations in December and have refused permission for some other public political parties rallies or debates.

Some fear an NCP win may cause a violent reaction in a population anxious for democratic change. Others worry the NCP would not accept defeat, which could also lead to violence.

REFERENDUM

On January 9, 2011 southern Sudanese vote in a referendum on independence from the north. While most analysts agree the south is likely to vote for secession, many Sudanese question why the elections have been scheduled just nine months ahead of the referendum. In the case of secession, any positions or seats won by the SPLM and other southern Sudanese parties in the north would have to be re-elected, as would any NCP victories in the south.

 

Political Party financing

January 6th, 2010

Out of the 249 countries in the world only 75 (30%) have a system of regulating financing of political parties and 41 of them have no system whatsoever. South Africa is one of the 75 countries that regulates such financing.

Only 9 out of the 53 African countries have a provision that compels political parties to disclose and only 6 of those expect them to disclose all the contributions they receive. Lesotho has a threshold that anything above 20000 Malutis (R20000) must be disclosed. South Africa has no such provisions!

Quiet interesting …

Karzai orders Afghan parliament to suspend break

January 4th, 2010

KABUL (Reuters) – Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Monday ordered parliament to suspend a winter break so that it can vet and vote on new cabinet nominees after lawmakers rejected over two thirds of his original candidates.
 But there may be a difficult confrontation ahead as the president plans to return some of the failed choices as candidates for different ministries, a senior official said.

Parliament dealt Karzai a painful blow on Saturday when it rejected 17 out of 24 of his nominees, casting Afghanistan into further political disarray just as the turmoil caused by last year’s fraud-marred presidential election is subsiding.

If Karzai fails to have his cabinet approved in the next few weeks he will have to head to a London conference later this month seeking extra funds from Western donors without being able to say who will control a significant chunk of them.

Parliament was due to start a six-week winter break later this week, which would have made it almost impossible for Karzai to assemble a full government in less than two months.

“President Hamid Karzai has issued a decree to parliament to refrain from going on winter leave to complete the process of voting for new cabinet members,” his palace said in a statement.

Karzai ordered the decree based on article 107 of the Afghan constitution, which allows the president to convene “extraordinary sessions of parliament during recess,” the palace said. The new cabinet will be presented for a vote of confidence “in several days,” it said.

Mohammad Karim Baaz, a deputy minister for parliamentary affairs, told Reuters the new list would most likely be presented to the lower house on Sunday, and that some of the rejected candidates would be included with new portfolios.

POLITICAL SHOWDOWN

The decree could lead to a showdown between Karzai and parliamentarians who flexed their muscles over the weekend, making full use of a rare opportunity to hold the president to account by rejecting a large swathe of his cabinet nominees.

Many parliamentarians were already fed up with Karzai’s often autocratic leadership style and tendency to ignore parliament, and by calling on the constitution to delay the winter break, Karzai is likely to arouse further anger.

While parliament will presumably have to abide by the decree, members could give the president a double blow by simply vetoing any new list, especially if Karzai does resubmit some of the old faces.

The rejected nominees included several key allies of Karzai, who has led Afghanistan since U.S.-backed Afghan forces overthrew the Taliban government in 2001.

Those rejected also included the only woman on the list and the powerful former energy minister, Ismail Khan, a veteran anti-Soviet commander and outspoken critic of the United States.

Like the regional commanders who threw their backing behind Karzai in the election, apparently in return for cabinet and provincial positions, the West had certain ministers it was keen to see retain their portfolios.

Several of these, in key ministries including defense, interior and finance, were endorsed by parliament.

Karzai also wants parliament to approve two new ministries, one for literacy and another for martyrs and the disabled.

RISING VIOLENCE

The latest government crisis comes when violence in Afghanistan has reached the highest level since the 2001 ouster of the Taliban. Last year the number of U.S. service personnel to die in Afghanistan was more than twice that in 2008.

In the latest incidents, four U.S. troops and a British soldier were killed in two separate improvised bomb explosions in southern Afghanistan on Sunday, foreign forces said.

The four U.S. troops were the first American military casualties in Afghanistan in 2010. They were killed in an improvised explosive device (IED) strike.

A British solder from 1st Battalion, The Royal Anglian Regiment, also died while on foot patrol in the Nad Ali district of Helmand province on Sunday afternoon.

U.S. President Barack Obama is sending in 30,000 extra troops as part of his new war strategy, to try to turn the tide. Other NATO countries are sending some 7,000 more.

But there are already around 110,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan and, despite the numbers, they are locked in a stalemate with the Taliban, unable to stem the rising tide of suicide and roadside bomb attacks.

(Additional reporting by Hamid Shalizi; Editing by Emma Graham-Harrison)

 

 

Thousands in new year Hong Kong march for democracy

January 4th, 2010

 

HONG KONG (Reuters) – Thousands of Hong Kong residents appealed to China on New Year’s Day to allow full democracy to be introduced soon in the city, as opposition lawmakers pressed forward with a mass resignation plan later this month.
  
Congregating outside the city’s historic domed legislature, protesters carried colorful banners with slogans such as “Democracy Now!” and made their way to Beijing’s representative office.

Some demonstrators held aloft portraits of Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo, demanding the release of the prominent activist and writer, jailed last week for 11 years on a subversion charge.

Organizers said more than 30,000 protesters turned out for the New Year’s Day “return our right to universal suffrage” march. Police put the number at around 9,000.

Hundreds of police erected steel barricades as protesters with loudhailers converged on Beijing’s liaison office in the former British colony, returned to Chinese rule in 1997.

There were minor scuffles when police tried to prevent a small number of protesters from storming the office.

A group of five pro-democracy legislators plan to resign en masse from the city’s legislature, following the release of a political reform blueprint for elections in 2012, which democracy advocates say does not go far enough.

The subsequent city-wide by-elections in Hong Kong’s five major districts will trigger what the liberals say amounts to a symbolic referendum on full democracy.

Beijing has already promised to allow a full-scale election in Hong Kong in 2017 for the city’s leader. But recent signs, including comments by pro-Beijing figures, have suggested Beijing may only allow a power-preserving version of democracy with rules stacked against opposition candidates.

Hong Kong’s mini-constitution guarantees full democracy as an “ultimate aim” but the city’s seven million people now have no direct say in their leader.

Beijing remains wary of upsurges of public discontent in Hong Kong, with Chinese premier Wen Jiabao recently warning Hong Kong’s bowtie-wearing leader Donald Tsang to be wary of “deep-rooted conflicts.” In 2003, half a million protesters spilled onto the streets in anger at the administration of Hong Kong’s then-leader Tung Chee-hwa, who resigned soon afterwards.

The Man Rules

December 26th, 2009

At last a guy has taken the time to write this all down   

 

 Finally, the guys’ side of the story. ( I must admit, it’s pretty good.) 

We always hear the rules‘ From the female side Now here are the rules from the male side.  


These are our rules!
Please note … these are all numbered ‘1 ‘ 
ON PURPOSE!
 

 

  1. 1.       Men are NOT mind readers.

    1. Learn to work the toilet seat. You’re a big girl. If it’s up, put it down. We need it up, you need it down.
    You don’t hear us complaining about you leaving it down.

    1. Sunday sports It’s like the full moon or the changing of the tides. Let it be.

    1. Crying is blackmail.

    1. Ask for what you want. Let us be clear on this one: 
    Subtle hints do not work!
    Strong hints do not work!
    Obvious hints do not work!
    Just say it!

    1. Yes and No are perfectly acceptable answers to almost every question.

    1. Come to us with a problem only if you want help solving it. That’s what we do. Sympathy is what your girlfriends are for.

    1. Anything we said 6 months ago is inadmissible in an argument. In fact, all comments become Null and void after 7 Days. 

    1. If you think you’re fat, you probably are.
    Don’t ask us.

    1. If something we said can be interpreted two ways and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, we meant the  other one 

    1. You can either ask us to do something Or tell us how you want it done.  Not both. If you already know best how to do it, just do it yourself.

    1. Whenever possible, Please say whatever you have to say during commercials..

    1. Christopher Columbus did NOT need directions and neither do we.

    1. ALL men see in only 16 colors, like Windows default settings. Peach, for example, is a fruit, not color. Pumpkin is also a fruit. We have no idea what mauve is.

    1. If it itches, it will be scratched..

  2. 2.       Have a good lazing around Boxing Day enjoying … You know what!!! Don’t Drink and Drive!

Democracy and Political Parties

December 21st, 2009

Strong and sustainable democracy is dependent on the existence of well – functioning political parties, so says Vidar Helgesen, Secretary General International IDEA. Do you agree? Please substantiate …

We support our public representatives!

December 15th, 2009

Democratically elected councillors have been targeted, attacked and lost their houses over the past year and as we are all enjoying the fruits of their labour, their families are without a home.

Why target individual councillors? Is it because they are soft targets who have opened their homes to the needy sometimes at very odd hours?

Why demand houses from Councils when it is very clear in terms of Section 83 and 84 of the Municipal Structures Act as well as the Constitution of our country which powers and functions does this Councils have?

It is only Metropolitan Councils in this country that are fully accredited to deliver houses yet no matter how many times do Councils state the aforementioned fact, the peacetime heroes continue to victimize them.

Do we have to lose lives before the State decides to provide security for these Councillors’ properties and their loved ones? Why are all these marches aimed at local government? What role do their principals – the political parties play in their failure? Are political parties not guilty of failing to provide guidance to the people they proudly presented as the cream of the crop to the electorate before each election?

They are accused of not communicating with their constituencies yet we know that very few people attend the councillor’s meeting as the “goodies” associated with attending a meeting convened by the Executive Mayor, the MEC or the Premier are not there. This councillor has no budget for food and transport at his disposal when organizing his or her meeting.

Why not the other spheres of government?

Everyone kicks dust when an allegation of non — compliance of local government with the procurement procedures for a R500 purchase yet they keep quiet when such are not complied with in a deal that involve billions of rands!

The Councillors are our public representatives and we love them! We voted them in a democratic election to represent us and we can only remove them through democratic means. Let us treat all public representatives as equals and this unfair targeting of Councillors must come to an end. Political parties must also treat their public representatives with the respect they deserve.

We call on government and organized local government not only to have a local government week but a week dedicated to these individuals, the public representatives who sacrifices their families time to attend to the needs of the poor. Let us appreciate their efforts and the sacrifices they make for our good. Let’s not only hear about how good they were when they are dead.

Did you know that they do not have any power to sign Council cheques yet they are often accused of mismanaging Council funds? Did you know that they do not form part of the tender committees yet they are accused of allocating tenders to their favourites?

Join us in wishing them and their families, a festive season filled with joy and lots of fun!

Why elect then abuse them?

CAUCUS.COM